Compiling NMap on a fresh install of SuSE 11.0

So, I’m researching the NMAP tool from… and needed to compile it on my various linux test boxes.

suse1:~/nmap # ./configure
checking whether NLS is requested… yes
checking build system type… i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type… i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for gcc… no
checking for cc… no
checking for cl.exe… no
configure: error: in `/root/nmap’:
configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH
See `config.log’ for more details.

Only problem is they are fresh installations with the minimum of options during the setup of the computers. IE: I went with basic server options with no additional packages during the install of each flavor of Linux.

So where do I go from here… welp, download and compile of course.
In the end I needed 15 different rpm packages from my SuSE DVD… and they needed to be installed in the following order:

1. gmp-4.2.2-30.1.i586.rpm
2. libmpfr1-2.3.1-4.1.i586.rpm
3. cpp43-4.3.1_20080507-6.1.i586.rpm
4. cpp-4.3-39.1.i586.rpm
5. linux-kernel-headers-2.6.25-8.1.noarch.rpm
6. glibc-devel-2.8-14.1.i586.rpm
7. libstdc.43-devel-4.3.1_20080507-6.1.i586.rpm
8. libstdc.43-4.3.1_20080507-6.1.i586.rpm
9. libgomp43-4.3.1_20080507-6.1.i586.rpm
10. libmudflap43-4.3.1_20080507-6.1.i586.rpm
11. gcc43-4.3.1_20080507-6.1.i586.rpm
12. gcc43-c.4.3.1_20080507-6.1.i586.rpm
13. gcc-4.3-39.1.i586.rpm
14. gcc-c.4.3-39.1.i586.rpm
15. make-3.81-103.1.i586.rpm

I’ve posted them at my files webiste

After installing all of these, the remaining installation proceedure outlined on the nmap website went perfectly… I now have a working version on my SuSE 11.0 text box.

All new Day

Today was an interesting one… Not. Not much happened today that was all that note worthy. Today was the one of four more days at my current “day” job. Overall not bad. It was a 7am to 7pm shift where I was so engaged with what I was doing I didn’t even remember to take my lunch.
Anyways, this does lead into my overall thoughts for the past few days which are indeed technical.

My question I want to pose to the world in general… Is it time for a replacement to Facebook?

I ask because of the last several news worthy articles about Facebook have all been about their wild changes to their privacy policies. Is it just to much to ask that my private thoughts I posted for friends and family… Oh I don’t know… Remain only for their eyes?

I bring this up because of the other stories about employers researching new employees or applicants on the internet for what their online profiles look like. Now it is, as far as I know, against the law for them to hold your online persona against you when considering job applicants… But you just know it happens… Right? Am I alone in thinking that?

Anyways I was wanting to ask that for a few reasons. I have been developing a remote support software, like many others Kaseya and BigFix being just two, that can remotely manage computers. Well… Here is the thing… I just got a shiny new job at BigFix and I feel it would be not very appropriate to continue with that project as long as I worked there. I have also been slowly getting away from helping the general public with IT support problems as well.

(come on Daniel, wrap it up… LOL)

I need a new project that doesn’t clearly introduce a conflict of interest to my new job.
Thus I’m proposing that maybe I could start putting together the new replacement for Facebook… With all the security, privacy and features that everyone wants in their social networking website of choice.

I have a wonderful idea for a “privacy slider” that would be attached to every post that users make… Wether it is short Twitter-like posts, pictures, long blog articles, or even simple conversations between friends, family, coworkers and public. Everything has a privacy value that you can change at the time of posting. This way you are the master of what is public, private and who in-between can see it…

Leave your comments below… I will read each and every idea as I’m excited to maybe work on the new and improved

Internet Cameras… We’re talking Enemy of the State stuff…


If I told you that there are literally thousands of publicly accessible cameras that you could pull up on your computer right now… would you believe me?

A little Google search, inurl:/view/index.shtml, shows us only one brand of public IP Cameras.

I tell you this because of my current project that i have recently had a lot of success with.  My goal is to setup cameras through out my apartment in order to monitor what goes on within it.

What I’m wanting is three very basic things.  It took me a few days of research to verify that they were possible.  The first thing I wanted for my camera project was the ability to use my web-cam along with network IP cameras I will purchase over time.  I wanted to be able to access all of the cameras the same way… which meant that I needed a computer software to turn my USB web-cam into an IP Camera, or at least act like one.  The second thing I wanted was to have a software package that will display the video feeds from all my cameras on one 20” LCD I have in my office.  This LCD will work exclusively to display the security system.  The system itself, using this software would act much like a DVR and record the video feeds to a file on it’s hard drive.  Lastly I wanted the ability to view the cameras remotely on my iPhone.  IMG_0001

I was very happy to find that all of this was possible with two pieces of software.  One is called IP Vision Pro, and is an iPhone app available through the iTunes App Store for only $24.99.  This application gives me the ability to  watch and control IP Network Cameras which are publicly available over the internet. 

The second software package I would need is called w5_mainWebCamXP.  I will be using the Pro license because it has the ability to have unlimited number of cameras, among other very useful features.

This software not only connects to IP Network Cameras like the IP Vision Pro software, but will also turn my USB web-cam into an IP Network Camera as well. 

WebCamXP also has the advanced features of those expensive monitoring programs like DVR functionality.

Now that the software is out of the way, I can focus on cameras.  When I have additional camera research I’ll be sure to post it here…